![]() If you are not using ATC of any sort, then I guess it does not really matter if the data is a bit outdated.ĭespite this limitation, I still love the GTN-750 - it is so much better than using that awful GNS530 it is worth any workaround. One of the biggest areas of conflict seems to be the STAR/Approach area - I put them in as best I can, but the thing is Pilot2ATC is going to vector you at that point anyway (in most cases), so your plan in the GTN-750 does not really matter. You can also add custom fixes on the fly pretty easily, so it is pretty easy to add anything that is missing. I also use Pilot2ATC, and the trick there is to add a much large leeway of error before ATC tells you that you are off course. Others do not, but it works fine as a popup which I put in the lower left corner of the display. Some aircraft vendors 'integrate' it so it replaces the G530 or acts as an additional NavAid over the default LR FMS. I only use the GTN750 with small aircraft, so the flight plans are usually not that long or complex. Running XP11.50b13, been using GTN 750 for over a year in many of my planes. I simply recreate the flight plan again in the GTN750, and so far I have been able to get it close enough to fly with. I have given up on importing flight plans from anything else as the odds of getting it in has been very low (in my limited experience). ![]() Yes, the lack of matching data with XP 11 is a nuisance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |